The Execution Cycle Is How You Already Think (You Just Don't Know It Yet)

You've been running this cycle your whole life. You just never had a name for it.

I want you to think about the last time you planned a family road trip. Not a hypothetical one. A real one. The kind where you pack up the SUV, point it toward the Grand Canyon or Yellowstone or D.C., stay at hotels you found online, eat at places you half-remember from your own childhood, and try to give your kids a sense of the country they're growing up in.

That trip, from the first spark of the idea to the moment you got home and looked at your credit card statement, moved through six distinct phases. You didn't name them. You didn't draw them on a whiteboard. But you moved through every single one.

Those six phases are what we call the Execution Cycle. And they're the backbone of how we measure execution capability with the Execution Index.

The Execution Cycle isn't something I invented in a conference room. It's something I noticed by planning my own family trips and leading multimillion dollar transformations. I refined it by working with other leaders who did some parts well, and struggled at others. It's the pattern that shows up every time someone takes an idea and turns it into something real. The phases are Vision, Architecture, Alignment, Momentum, Reflection, and Integration. And the best way I can explain them is to walk you through something you've probably already done.

But first, here's the trap. Because you run this cycle constantly, on everything from planning dinner to launching a product, you may naturally assume you're good at execution. You get things done. Things work out. So what's the problem?

The problem is that "getting things done" and "being strong at execution across the board" aren't the same thing. You've been compensating for your weak phases your whole life without realizing it. You muscle through, or you avoid certain types of projects, or you surround yourself with people who happen to cover your gaps. That works until it doesn't. And when it stops working, most people blame the project, the team, or the timing. They almost never look at the cycle itself.

Vision: You Saw Something That Doesn't Exist Yet

It probably started on a random Tuesday. Maybe you saw a photo of the Grand Canyon on Instagram. Maybe your kid asked a question about history and you thought, "we should go to D.C." Maybe you remembered a road trip your parents took you on and you wanted to give that to your own family.

Whatever the trigger, something clicked. You saw a trip that didn't exist yet, and you started to believe it could.

Here's the part that matters: you didn't just daydream. You ran it through a quick mental filter. Could we actually afford this? When would we go? Is this realistic for kids our age? You validated it, even if you didn't call it that. You moved it from "wouldn't that be nice" to "I think we could actually do this."

That's Vision. Not fantasy. Not wishful thinking. Vision is seeing something that could realistically work and deciding it should happen.

Contrast that with "let's fly the family on a private jet to Bora Bora and stay at a five-star resort for two weeks." For most people, that's a daydream. It's pleasant to think about. It's not Vision. And even if you could swing it once, could you do it again next year? Could you build a life where that's sustainable? For all but the very wealthiest people on earth, the answer is no. That's your first clue that Vision and Integration are connected. Real Vision imagines something you can actually sustain, not just pull off once.

Architecture: You Built the Plan

Once you decided "we're doing this," your brain shifted gears. You started looking at actual dates. When do the kids have school break? Can you and your spouse both get time off? How far is the drive? What's the budget look like?

You pulled up Google Maps. You researched hotels. You figured out which national parks require reservations. You checked your bank account and your calendar and started fitting pieces together.

This is Architecture. You moved from "this could work" to "here's how it works." You built the structure that turns an idea into an actual plan. (If you want to stress-test how deep your Architecture goes, try running the 5-How Test on your next project.)

Some people are naturally incredible at this phase. They love the spreadsheet. They love the itinerary. They'll have a day-by-day breakdown with alternate routes in case of weather.

Other people skip this entirely and just start driving. We'll get to why that matters.

Alignment: You Got Everyone Moving Together

Now you had to sell it. Your boss needed to approve the time off. Your spouse's boss needed to approve theirs. Your spouse needed to be excited about the destination and not just tolerate it. Your kids needed to hear something that sounded fun enough that they wouldn't complain about being in a car for 12 hours (too much).

Everyone who has a vote or a veto needed to be moving in the same direction.

But here's what Alignment actually looks like in practice: it's not just getting buy-in. It's making tradeoffs. You wanted to leave in June. Your boss said July works better. You wanted three days of museums and monuments. Your kids lobbied for a day at a theme park. You had no plan for meals and your spouse jumped in to research restaurants and pack road snacks. The final plan didn't look like anyone's original vision. It looked like something everyone could live with and be genuinely excited about.

That's Alignment. Not getting your way. Not even getting everyone to agree with you. Getting everyone oriented in the same direction, which almost always means giving something up to get something bigger.

This is where a surprising number of plans die. Not because the plan was bad, but because someone critical wasn't brought in at the right time or in the right way. Maybe your spouse wanted the beach, not a national park, and you didn't notice until the resentment was already baked in. Maybe your boss said "bad timing" and you didn't push back or offer a compromise. Maybe your teenager announced they'd rather stay with friends and nobody took that seriously until it blew up.

The people who are strong in Alignment know how to read a room, negotiate tradeoffs, and get commitment, not just agreement. There's a difference between "fine, whatever" and "yes, I'm in, let's do this."

Momentum: You Did the Actual Work

Here's where the rubber meets the road. Literally.

You bought the tickets. You booked the hotels. You got the oil changed. You confirmed the park was open on the dates you planned. You packed. You loaded the car. You drove.

Momentum is execution in motion. It's the doing. It's the phase most people think of when they hear "getting things done."

But here's what I've noticed: Momentum without the previous three phases is just activity. You can be incredibly busy and accomplish nothing meaningful because you didn't have clear Vision, sound Architecture, or real Alignment.

And Momentum without the next two phases is just a one-time event. You pulled it off, but you didn't extract the lessons and you didn't change anything structurally. It happened. It's over. Nothing is different.

Reflection: You Looked Back (Or More Likely, You Didn't)

This is where personal life mirrors work life in a way that's almost uncomfortable.

The trip is over. You're home. You're exhausted. You're back at work on Monday.

Did you sit down and think about what actually happened? Did you discover a travel rewards card that would have saved you $800? Did you figure out that booking hotels through the hotel's website would have been 40% cheaper than the shadytravelplans dot com site you used? Did you realize that your kids had the most fun at the random roadside diner and the least fun at the expensive attraction you'd planned around?

Did you make a photo book? Write down the stories while they were fresh? Capture the memories in a way you could actually revisit?

Most people skip Reflection entirely. In work, in life, in everything. The project ends, the trip ends, and they move on to the next thing without ever extracting the lessons.

A 2025 McKinsey study found that only 21% of senior executives reported having strategies that met basic quality standards. That's a 40% decline from 2010. Organizations aren't just failing to execute. They're failing to learn from their failures and build better approaches.

That's a Reflection problem.

Integration: You Turned It Into a System

The trip is done. Now what?

Integration isn't about what you learned. That was Reflection. Integration is about what you build from here. Can this become a tradition? Can you restructure the family budget so the road trip has its own line item? Can you set up a savings account that auto-deposits $200 a month so next summer's trip is already funded before you start planning it?

Or did you blow through savings and rack up credit card debt? Are you behind on work? Did you burn vacation days you actually needed for something else? If so, you pulled off a great trip. You did not build a system.

Integration is the phase where a one-time success gets absorbed into how things actually work going forward. For a family, that looks like the start of a tradition with a budget and a rhythm. For a work project, the stakes are even higher.

Think about a successful product launch. Momentum got it across the finish line. Reflection told you what worked and what didn't. But Integration is what turns that launch into a permanent change in how your team operates. It's the new process that replaces the old one. It's the playbook that means the next launch doesn't start from scratch. It's the shift from "we did a thing" to "this is how we do things now."

This is the distinction that matters most, and the one most organizations miss. They celebrate the win, maybe they even capture the lessons, and then they go back to the old way of working. The one-time success stays a one-time success. Nothing changes structurally.

Research from Bridges Business Consultancy, based on interviews with over 2,100 leaders across four continents, found that 97% agree implementation fails because of bad execution, not bad strategy. The strategy was fine. The plan was fine. What broke was the ability to carry the work through to the point where it actually sticks. That's Integration.

Where This Gets Personal

Here's the thing I keep coming back to: everyone is naturally strong in some of these phases and weak in others. And this isn't a character flaw. It's how human cognition actually works.

Research in cognitive science has shown that the brain operates on fundamental trade-offs. The neural systems that support big-picture, visionary thinking and the systems that support focused, detail-oriented execution work in opposition. When one is firing, the other quiets down. You literally can't be in full Vision mode and full Architecture mode at the same time. They pull from different cognitive resources.

That's why the patterns are so consistent. The visionaries who can see a future that doesn't exist yet but can't build a plan to save their life. The architects who build flawless plans but can't get anyone else excited about them. The momentum machines who will outwork anyone but never stop to reflect on whether they're working on the right thing. The reflective systems thinkers who can tell you exactly why the last three projects failed but struggle to generate the bold vision for the next one.

A global survey of 700 executives by Strategy& (PwC's strategy consulting arm) found that only 8% of company leaders excel at both strategy and execution. Eight percent. And these are people who've been selected, promoted, and developed for decades. It's not about effort or intelligence. The phases pull in opposite directions.

Research from Harvard Business School found that employees who spent just 15 minutes a day reflecting on what they'd learned performed 23% better than those who spent that time doing more work. But action-oriented people almost never stop to reflect, because doing feels more productive than thinking. That's the Momentum-Reflection tension playing out in real time.

I've seen this in myself. I ran the Execution Index on my own company and scored an 80.3. Vision and Integration were both perfect 10s. I can see where we need to go and I can make the changes permanent. That's 20 years of operations and audit work showing up in the data.

But Alignment? 5.9. On a scale of 10, the person who built the execution diagnostic scored a 5.9 in bringing people along. That gap was sitting in plain sight for years, showing up in every client conversation, every partnership discussion, every time I built something brilliant and then wondered why nobody else was as excited about it as I was. I didn't see it until I measured it.

I'm working on it. I've built alignment steps into my process. But it's not natural for me, and I don't think it ever will be. That's the whole point. You don't have to become a different person. You have to build systems around the phases that don't come naturally.

The point isn't to fix your weaknesses through sheer willpower. The point is to know where you're strong so you can lean into it, and where you're weak so you can support it. That might mean building a team that covers the phases you don't. It might mean using tools and processes that force you through the phases you'd naturally skip. It might just mean being honest with yourself about why certain kinds of projects always seem to stall in the same place.

Once you see your own pattern, you can't unsee it. And that's the whole point.

This Cycle Runs Everything

The Execution Cycle doesn't just apply to road trips. It applies to everything.

It happens fast on small decisions: you see a problem at work, think through an approach, check with your boss, fix it, note what you learned, and adjust your process. That's all six phases in an afternoon.

It happens on a massive scale with system transformations: a company sees a market shift, builds a strategy, aligns the organization, executes the rollout, measures what worked, and integrates the designed solutions into ongoing operations. That's all six phases over months or years.

The cycle is the same. The scale changes.

And once you understand where you naturally excel in this cycle and where you need support, you change the game. You stop wondering why some things come easy and others feel impossible. You start building teams that cover each other's gaps. You start recognizing when a project is about to stall because it's entering a phase where nobody on the team is strong.

Why This Matters More in the Age of AI

Here's where I need to say something that might not be popular: AI is the most powerful execution tool most of us have ever had access to. But it has a massive blind spot, and that blind spot is yours.

AI is an amplifier. It makes you faster at whatever you point it at. But here's the problem: you're going to point it at the things you're already good at. If you're a Vision person, you'll use AI to brainstorm bigger, bolder futures. If you're an Architecture person, you'll use it to build more detailed plans. If you're a Momentum person, you'll use it to crank through more tasks faster. You'll iterate on your strengths because that's what feels productive. And your blind spots will stay blind.

This isn't theoretical. A 2025 randomized controlled trial by METR found that experienced developers using AI tools were actually 19% slower than those working without AI, despite believing they were 24% faster. They applied AI to tasks where they were already expert, spent time reviewing and modifying output they didn't need, and ended up rejecting more than half of it. They used the tool where they were strong instead of where they were weak.

Research from Harvard Business School and BCG found the same pattern from the other direction. In a study of 758 consultants, the people who benefited most from AI weren't the ones who used it for everything. They were the "Centaurs," the ones who strategically divided work between themselves and AI based on awareness of their own strengths and gaps. The people who applied AI indiscriminately saw far less benefit.

The implication is simple: AI can cover your execution gaps, but only if you know what they are. If you don't know where you're weak in the cycle, you'll just have AI iterating with you on what you're already good at. Which is exactly why the internet is full of people generating incredible plans, prototypes, and demos with AI, and never shipping anything that sticks.

Find Out Where You Stand

If you read through these six phases and some felt like home while others felt like a blind spot, that's not a coincidence. That's your execution pattern. And knowing it changes how you work, how you build teams, and how you use every tool at your disposal.

The Execution Index measures exactly this. It's not a personality test. It's not an engagement survey. It measures your operational capability to take an idea and turn it into a result. And it shows you exactly where in the Execution Cycle you're strong and where things break down.

Before you take it, think about which phase felt most like you while reading this. Then see if the assessment confirms what you already suspect.

Here's what it comes down to: this is about getting shit done. Not talking about it. Not planning to plan. Not attending another meeting about the meeting. Actually moving things from ideas to outcomes.

The Execution Cycle is how you already think. Now you know what to call it. And more importantly, you can measure it.

---

FAQ

What is the Execution Cycle?

The Execution Cycle is a six-phase framework that maps how initiatives move from idea to sustained result: Vision, Architecture, Alignment, Momentum, Reflection, and Integration. It applies to personal projects, team efforts, and organizational transformations.

How is the Execution Index different from a personality assessment?

Personality assessments tell you how you're wired. The Execution Index tells you how you perform. It measures operational capability across the six phases of the Execution Cycle, showing you where you're strong and where things break down when you're trying to get something done.

Can the Execution Cycle apply to small, everyday decisions?

Yes. The cycle operates at every scale. A quick fix at work can move through all six phases in an afternoon. A company transformation might take years. The phases are the same. The timeline and complexity change.